Customers currently in the duration of their trial period will not be able to download model data.
Please provide the application note numbers that you wish to review for your distributor support team.
Please be aware that services differ from the free-to-register “JMAG-Express Online” and the “JMAG Technical Library”.
Mid- and large-sized power transformers need to be able to operate over the long term, so they are always required to control running costs from losses. Iron loss is one of the main losses in a transformer, and it can lead to temperature increases and efficiency decreases because it consumes electric power as heat in a magnetic material.
Using finite element analysis (FEA) to confirm the distribution of iron loss density makes it possible to study a transformer’s local geometry during design. Further, evaluating the ratio and distribution of the iron and copper losses through FEA becomes advantageous when designing a transformer.
This note presents how to obtain the iron and copper losses of a three-phase transformer.
Iron loss Density Distribution
The iron loss density distribution of the core is shown in fig. 1, the joule loss density distribution of the core in fig. 2, and the hysteresis loss density distribution of the core in fig. 3. From fig. 1, it is apparent that iron losses increase in the inside corners. This is because the magnetic flux flows through the shortest route of the core. As can be seen from figures 2 and 3, a large percentage of the iron loss is hysteresis loss.
Current Density Distribution and Copper Loss Density Distribution
The current density distribution of the coil is shown in fig. 4, and the joule loss density distribution in fig. 5. From fig. 4, it is apparent that the current density distribution is approximately the same in each phase. Joule loss is higher in the secondary coil than the primary coil, as indicated in fig. 5. This is because the current is larger in the secondary coil.
Percentage of Loss
The percentages of the iron and copper losses are indicated in table 1. Table 1 shows that the ratio of iron loss in the total loss is large. Therefore, investigating ways to reduce iron loss would be effective in reducing the total amount of loss. Furthermore, finding ways to reduce hysteresis loss would be effective in reducing the iron loss.
This website uses cookies to improve functionality and performance. If you continue browsing the site, you are giving implied consent to the use of cookies on this website.
If you want to know more or refuse consent, read our Cookie Policy. Accept
Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.