[JAC132] Loss Analysis of a Three-phase Transformer

Sign in to download the data
Remember me
Sign In

*Please prepare a license ID and password for the license administrator.
*It is different from the service for JMAG WEB MEMBER (free membership). Please be careful.
About authentication ID for JMAG website


Mid- and large-sized power transformers need to be able to operate over the long term, so they are always required to control running costs from losses. Iron loss is one of the main losses in a transformer, and it can lead to temperature increases and efficiency decreases because it consumes electric power as heat in a magnetic material.
Using finite element analysis (FEA) to confirm the distribution of iron loss density makes it possible to study a transformer’s local geometry during design. Further, evaluating the ratio and distribution of the iron and copper losses through FEA becomes advantageous when designing a transformer.
This note presents how to obtain the iron and copper losses of a three-phase transformer.

Iron loss Density Distribution

The iron loss density distribution of the core is shown in fig. 1, the joule loss density distribution of the core in fig. 2, and the hysteresis loss density distribution of the core in fig. 3. From fig. 1, it is apparent that iron losses increase in the inside corners. This is because the magnetic flux flows through the shortest route of the core. As can be seen from figures 2 and 3, a large percentage of the iron loss is hysteresis loss.

Current Density Distribution and Copper Loss Density Distribution

The current density distribution of the coil is shown in fig. 4, and the joule loss density distribution in fig. 5. From fig. 4, it is apparent that the current density distribution is approximately the same in each phase. Joule loss is higher in the secondary coil than the primary coil, as indicated in fig. 5. This is because the current is larger in the secondary coil.

Percentage of Loss

The percentages of the iron and copper losses are indicated in table 1. Table 1 shows that the ratio of iron loss in the total loss is large. Therefore, investigating ways to reduce iron loss would be effective in reducing the total amount of loss. Furthermore, finding ways to reduce hysteresis loss would be effective in reducing the iron loss.

Search Filter

  • All Categories