It is now simple to be precise
GET a Trial Version for Free
Event News Training
Event
JMAG Users Conference 2011: December 7-8 JMAG-Designer Ver.11.0 has been released
JMAG News Letter Fall Edition JMAG-RT Viewer Debut!
July 11-13TECHNO-FRONTIER 2012 Japan
July 03
NEW!
POWERSYS
JMAG Users Conference in Germany
Germany
June 26-28CWIEME Berlin 2012 Germany
May 15-172012 SIMULIA Customer Conference USA
 
News
2012  
January 25
NEW
JMAG-Designer Ver.11.0 has been released
    >> JMAG Ver.11 New Feature (SWF, 3,592KB)
2011  
November 25 A new issue of the JMAG News Letter is now available
July 12 JMAG-Designer Ver.10.5 has been released
July 12 JMAG-Express
Sizing Feature for JMAG-Express Geometry
May 13 A new issue of the JMAG News Letter is now available
April 14 The Documentation used in the JMAG Skill Up Seminar 2010 is now available.
>> Archive



Training
July 11 POWERSYS
JMAG-Designer WORKSHOP
Graz, Austria
JMAG-Express
Example of the Week 2012-01-23
* Influence Analysis of Dimensional Tolerance using Morphing

The angle of the magnets in SPM motors use a fillet or chamfer. However, the fillet and chamfer of each product that is manufactured varies because to completely fabricate the same fillet or chamfer is difficult in the manufacturing process. Therefore, the dimensional tolerance is set so the motor performance is not affected by these variations.
This example presents the use of a magnetic field analysis to compare whether the cogging torque of the SPM motor is influenced by changing geometry in the tolerance range assuming the dimensional tolerance of the chamfer is ±0.4 mm.


· Cogging torque
The cogging torque waveform is indicated in Fig. 1 and the frequency components of the cogging torque are indicated in Fig. 2. The position of the peak value shifts as the dimensions of the chamfer change, but the peak value remains almost the same, as indicated in Fig. 1. The variations of the fundamental frequency of 360 Hz are smaller than the harmonic components, as indicated by the frequency components in Fig. 2.
Therefore, the variations of the geometry in the tolerance range of the chamfer only affect the cogging torque minimally.


· Back EMF
The back EMF waveform is indicated in Fig. 3 and the frequency components of the back EMF are indicated in Fig. 4. The value of the back EMF is almost the same even when the dimensions of the chamfer are changed, as indicated in Fig. 3. The variations of the fundamental frequency of 60 Hz are smaller than the harmonic components, as indicated by the frequency components in Fig. 4.
Therefore, the influence of the chamfer tolerance is minimal.




contact | sitemap  
        Powerd by JMAG Group