[JAC305] Loss Analysis of IPM Motor During Driving Cycle Considering Temperature Variation

Sign in to download the data

Sign In

*Please prepare a license ID and password for the license administrator.
*It is different from the service for JMAG WEB MEMBER (free membership). Please be careful.
About authentication ID for JMAG website

Overview

Loss Analysis of IPM Motor During Driving Cycle Considering Temperature Variation
Designers need to evaluate the efficiency of an EV/HEV drive motors while taking into account the various drive cycles. Drive cycle case studies use the losses obtained by magnetic field analyses to generate heat and the temperatures obtained by thermal analyses to more accurately evaluate losses. These types of case studies must evaluate the interaction between the loss and heat.
Simulations that use temperature-dependent efficiency maps can evaluate the rise in losses as the temperature of the coil and magnets increase during the drive cycle. Users can configure a thermal circuit to create a cooling model using a wide range of components, including cooling jackets and spray shaft cooling that accounts for temperature variations resulting from the cooling.
This case study evaluates the losses and temperature changes over time of an IPM motor during a WLTC drive cycle using temperature-dependent efficiency maps.

Analysis Flow

Fig. 1 Drive Cycle Analysis Accounting for Temperature Variations
Drive cycle simulations accounting for temperature variations run the magnetic field analysis before the thermal analysis.
The magnetic field analysis generates multiple efficiency maps that include the loss data according to the temperatures of both the coils and magnets.
The thermal analysis extracts the heat generation of each part from the efficiency map to obtain the temperatures at the current step based on the operating points of the drive cycle and the temperatures in the previous step.

Efficiency Map Before/After Temperature Rise

Fig. 2 indicates the operating points of the motor for the efficiency maps during the WLTC drive cycle. Fig. 3 presents efficiency maps before and after the temperature rise. Fig. 4 provides a loss difference map.
The operating points of the motor during the WLTC drive cycle expand over a broad area as seen in Fig. 2.
The maximum efficiency as the temperature rises in the parts declines about 6 points as seen in Fig. 3.
The higher coil temperature causes the copper losses to rise in the coil under high load due to larger resistance as seen in Fig. 4, but the iron losses in the stator decline at high speeds as the flux decreases due to higher magnet temperatures. That is why a drive cycle analysis is essential to account for the phenomena caused by complex changes in the losses resulting from higher temperatures in each part.

Fig. 2 Operating Points During WLTC Drive Cycle in the Efficiency Maps
Fig. 3 Efficiency Map Before/After Temperature Rise
Fig. 4 Loss Difference Map Before/After Temperature Rise

Drive Cycle Analysis Accounting for Temperature Variations

This case study ran a WLTC drive cycle analysis accounting for temperature variations in the coils and magnets. Fig. 5 illustrates the losses in each part over time. Fig. 6 presents the temperature variations over time.
The losses in the stator core and coil are high as seen in Fig. 5.
The temperatures of the stator core and coil that have numerous losses are not only high but change quickly as seen in Fig. 6.

Fig. 5 Losses of Each Part in the Drive Cycle Analysis
Fig. 6 Temperature of Each Part in the Drive Cycle Analysis

Search Filter

  • All Categories