[JAC257] Topology Optimization of an IPM Motor

 
Sign in to download the data

Sign In

*Please prepare a license ID and password for the license administrator.
*It is different from the service for JMAG WEB MEMBER (free membership). Please be careful.
About authentication ID for JMAG website

Overview

Topology Optimization of an IPM Motor
Motor design is facing even more sophisticated requirements. Each needs to satisfy torque ripple, back EMF, line voltage limit, demagnetization magnet tolerance, and core stress requirements as well as constraints on the displacement caused by centrifugal force all while maximizing torque at high and low speeds.
FEA optimizations are advantageous to realize designs meeting such strict requirements. Parametric optimizations can vary dimensions as design variables. Topology optimizations can evolve the initial geometry. Topology optimizations can also explore a large design space by hollowing out unnecessary parts, changing materials, and modifying connections to drastically transform the part layout.
This case study runs a topology optimization to minimize torque ripple and maximize average torque with the maximum stress on the rotor core and maximum radial displacement below a constant value.

Optimization Conditions

Fig. 1 illustrates the design region. Table 1 outlines the design requirements.
As shown by Fig. 1, the optimization sets the design region to the area around the magnet and gap that should significantly affect the Mises stress and torque. The rotor core geometry has symmetry every half pole. Therefore, the design region is one-half of the pole. The region geometry uses a mirror copy to create the rotor core parts. A multi-objective optimization simultaneously optimizes solutions according to multiple competing objective functions. 

Fig. 1 Design Regions
Table 1 Design Requirements/Optimization Objectives

Optimization Results

Fig. 2 presents the transition of the average torque and torque ripple rate of the cases with the maximum average torque for each generation. Fig. 3 illustrates the distribution of objective functions for feasible solutions. Fig. 4 shows the Mises stress distribution for the case with the highest average torque throughout all generations. Table 2 lists each physical quantity.
As shown by Fig. 2, the solutions converge with each generation as the average torque increases and the torque ripple rate decreases.
As illustrated by Fig. 4 and Table 2, the case with the maximum average torque satisfies the Mises stress and radial displacement constraints while also creating a flux barrier to increase the average torque.

Fig. 2 Transition of Average Torque and Torque Ripple Rate
Fig. 3 Distribution of Objective Functions for Feasible Solutions
Fig. 4 Mises Stress Distribution
Table 2 Physical Quantity Results

Search Filter

  • All Categories

An engineer's diary
JMAG-Express Online